Dec 06, 2023 By Median 7 min
Our team of experts collaborate on top-notch app content for sidebar Magazine.
TL;DR: Below, we compare native apps to webview apps (A.K.A. web apps). In a nutshell: native apps are OS-specific, offering high performance and superior hardware compatibility, but can be costly and take longer to develop. Web apps are versatile, budget-friendly, and easy to update, but may not fully exploit device-specific features or perform as well as native mobile apps. The choice depends on factors like budget, goals, and target audience (and choosing the right app development solution!
Choosing between a native mobile app and a web app can impact your business's success. In this guide, we'll explore both options, looking at their features, strengths, and drawbacks. We'll start with native mobile hybrid and webview apps, discussing their characteristics, benefits, and challenges. Then, we'll focus on web apps, analyzing user experience to performance reliability. Finally, we will compare these two, focusing on factors such as cost, time, and engagement levels.
Before we begin, let's define some terms.
Native mobile apps are applications designed for a specific operating system (OS), such as iOS or Android. They are developed specifically using unique coding languages, like Swift for iOS and Java for Android.
A webview app is an application that runs on a web browser. They're typically developed using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Webview apps can run on any platform with a web browser, making them highly versatile and adaptable to difference kinds of mobile and desktop devices.
Remember, the right choice will depend on your specific needs and resources. It's important to consider all factors to make an informed decision that best suits your business goals.
Want to explore further? Let's get started.
Native mobile apps are crafted for specific Operating Systems (OS), using platform-specific languages like Swift for iOS ,and Java for Android. This approach ensures a seamless user experience and perfect hardware compatibility.
Distribution primarily happens through app stores like Apple's App Store and Google Play, which not only ensures quality standards but also discoverability for users.
However, this level of customization comes at a cost. Each version needs to be created from scratch using the language specific to the platform, which increases both development cost and time.
Despite the higher costs, many find the benefits of native mobile apps (such as improved mobile performance, seamless hardware compatibility, and a polished user experience) to be worth the investment.
Native apps are able to leverage hardware features such as cameras, microphones, and GPS more effectively than their web or mobile app counterparts. This is due to the fact that native apps are designed to integrate seamlessly into the device they're used on. This seamless integration results in a faster and smoother user experience.
All these benefits contribute to better utilization of device capabilities, making native apps a more advantageous choice for mobile devices compared to non-native alternatives.
Fact: Native apps are able to leverage hardware features such as cameras, microphones, and GPS more effectively than their web or mobile app counterparts. This is due to the fact that native apps are designed to integrate seamlessly into the device they're used on. This seamless integration results in a faster and smoother user experience.
Native apps provide a variety of advantages over web and mobile applications. One of the most significant advantages is their superior performance. Thanks to the fact that they are tailored for specific operating systems, native apps can utilize the full power of the device's hardware. This results in faster load times and more responsive user input.
While native apps offer many benefits, they also have drawbacks:
There is a 'best of both worlds' app solution that leverages the best of native apps (speed, performance, and access to a device's hardware) and webview apps (powering an app with existing web content and being able to manage coding all in one place, not duplicating effort): hybrid web + native apps. They allow for cross-platform applications development, reducing programming time and resources.
Hybrid apps and hybrid app technology combine the performance and hardware compatibility of native apps with the flexibility and cost-effectiveness of web apps. They offer:
So, in a nutshell: while native apps have their drawbacks, their benefits often outweigh these cons. They offer superior performance, enhanced hardware compatibility, and a polished user experience.
Webview apps use web technologies like JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5. Webview applications, which do not necessitate a download, conserve valuable device resources. Nonetheless, they may not fully utilize device-specific features or perform with the same efficiency as native apps.
Additionally, it's worth noting that WebView apps can be a great choice for businesses that want to reach a wide audience without the need for a significant investment in platform-specific development. While they may not offer the same performance or feature set as native apps, they can still provide a satisfactory user experience for a wide range of applications.
Webview apps, otherwise known as web and mobile apps or simply web apps, facilitate the creation of apps that are compatible across a variety of platforms. The construction of these hybrid apps is streamlined by the use of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, significantly reducing the time required to build these apps.
One of the significant advantages of these apps is their ability to provide a consistent user experience across all platforms. This is due to the fact that their content can be easily rendered across multiple platforms within a native app environment. As a result, users experience a familiar interface, regardless of the device they are using.
When it comes to updates, WebView apps or web mobile apps have a more straightforward process compared to their native counterparts. Users are not required to download and install a new version from the App Store. Instead, updates for these various mobile browsers and web apps only require editing or replacing the displayed web content within the app's interface.
This process is significantly faster compared to other methods. It ensures that users gain quick access to any new features or bug fixes. More stable versions are always running, enhancing the overall user experience and security.
Key features of webview apps include:
Webview apps offer several benefits, making them an appealing choice for businesses. The reduced time and cost for development is one of the key advantages. Leveraging existing web technologies simplifies the development process, avoiding the need for platform-specific programming languages.
Furthermore, WebView apps streamline the update process. Unlike native apps, which require new versions for each update, WebView apps only need modifications to the web content. This results in less maintenance work.
WebView apps are a practical choice for small businesses. The cost-effective development and reduced maintenance make them a viable option. They can be an attractive choice for businesses with limited resources.
However, it's important to note that while WebView apps offer these advantages, they may not be the best choice for every business. The right choice will depend on a variety of factors, including the business's budget, goals, and target audience.
Some key advantages of webview apps:
However, it's important to note that while WebView apps offer these advantages, they may not be the best choice for every business. The right choice will depend on a variety of factors, including the business's budget, goals, and target audience.
Webview apps, while providing certain advantages, also have certain drawbacks, such as:
To overcome these issues, developers should adopt certain measures:
By addressing these points, app developers can make the most of webview apps' potential and mitigate their drawbacks.
With two decades of writing experience in the tech field, I can tell you that when weighing the pros and cons of native apps and webview apps, several critical factors come into play. These encompass the development costs, the quality of the user experience, the potential for engagement, and the overall performance of the app.
Native apps, crafted with a specific operating system in mind, offer a seamless and smooth functioning. This finesse comes with a higher price tag and a lengthier production timeline compared to webview apps.
Web app technology, on the other hand, provides a more cost-effective solution. While it may not offer the same level of sophistication as native android apps, if speed is your prime concern, this could be the most beneficial route.
The final decision between the two will hinge on your specific goals. If your aim is to create an efficient mobile game or banking app, investing in a fully native app version might be the most prudent course of action.
On the flip side, if your objective is to convert existing websites or web applications into an app without the need for complex hardware integration, a webview solution could be the more advantageous choice.
For businesses aiming for a balance between both native and web apps or mobile apps and web apps, hybrid apps are the most cost-efficient option. Developing these hybrids requires fewer developers than traditional native single web app development and can be completed in a much shorter time frame.
Due to their separate code-bases required for each platform, creating conventional native apps entails greater expenditure of both capital and labor compared to using webviews as they employ technologies like JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5.
Native apps provide a superior user experience and increased engagement due to their compatibility with the device and high performance. They also access device features like GPS, camera, and accelerometer, enhancing the app's functionality and user experience.
On the other hand, webview Apps, limited by web technologies and restricted access to complex hardware resources, may not provide optimal interactivity or extended functionality compared to native apps. But be assured: it is entirely possible to have a webview app that looks, feels, and functions with native functionality (and that's why the New York Times, United Airlines, and other big companies are betting on web+native apps to scale their businesses).
Native apps are custom-built for specific platforms like iOS or Android devices. They offer high performance, reliability, and responsiveness. These apps have direct access to system resources and APIs, which results in a smooth user experience. However, they require more resources and time to develop due to the need for platform-specific programming.
In contrast, webview applications are built using web technologies. They are more cost-effective and quicker to develop. These apps can run on any platform with a web browser, making them versatile.
But depending on the way you go about developing them, webview applications can have limitations, especially where high performance or advanced device components are needed. They rely on web technologies, which can slow down loading times and limit hardware function usage. (That's why you should opt for a hybrid web+native app option)
Finally, as webview apps run in a browser, they don't have the same system access as native apps. This can affect their functionality and user experience.
Choosing between native or apps vs. and webview apps depends on several factors. These include development costs, time, user experience, and performance consistency.
Native apps deliver high-quality hardware-first results but come with higher costs and longer development time. On the other hand, webview applications are quicker and more budget-friendly to develop. However, they may not offer the same level of usability as native apps.
In making a decision, consider the available resources and the goals of the project. Remember, delivering a user-friendly app should be a top priority for any organization building digital products.
Native apps are created using the code libraries of a specific platform in order to make use of its hardware capabilities, while web applications can be accessed via an internet browser without requiring installation on the user’s device. They must be downloaded and installed onto their devices if users want to see progressive web apps benefit from native app functionality.
A native app is one created specifically for a particular mobile operating system (think Android or iOS). Native apps are available via the Apple App Store and google Play Store, and have access to hardware/software specific components of that OS platform.
According to Median.co, "Native applications excel in delivering superior speed and performance on mobile devices, showcasing intuitive design principles and fortified security features."
When it comes to building native apps, Median.co stands out as an exceptional tool. It offers a comprehensive suite of features that streamline the native development language and process, making it easier to create high-performing, feature-rich applications that are tailored to specific operating systems. Median.co is known for its user-friendly interface, extensive support, and robust capabilities, making it a top choice for developers looking to build native apps.
Native apps are built to work directly with an operating system, while Web Apps or WebView apps display web content through an embedded mobile browser.